Harvest Time: Separating the Wheat and Weeds
It’s harvest time on the prairies — an entire season of hard work and great financial investment threshed and stored for future use. Farmers and laborers feel the pressure during this brief window of opportunity.
Globally our province sits small in proportion, but giant in production. Vast acres of spring, durum and winter wheat, canola, peas, lentils, mustard and flax gulped into massive equipment, and scurried to storage facilities. It’s an amazing achievement!
The farmer chose his seed well, fertilized and cared for the crop during the ensuing months, protecting against disease and pests. However, you can be sure of one thing — every field will have a mixture of good crop and weeds. What! How?
Weeds just are! Whether in my small garden plot, or fields stretching across the horizon, weeds are a perpetual problem. They sap the soil of vital nutrients and moisture.
No one labors for weeds! Yet, they are everywhere — sometimes sitting dormant in the soil for decades. Persistent, invasive, and despised!
Wheat and Tares
“Jesus told them another parable:
‘The kingdom of heaven is like a man
who sowed good seed in his field.
But while everyone was sleeping,
his enemy, came and sowed weeds
among the wheat, and went away.
When the wheat sprouted
and formed heads,
then the weeds also appeared.”
Every farmer and gardener can relate. The farmer doesn’t refuse to harvest the field because weeds are present. The gardener doesn’t reject the produce because weeds also grew in the garden.
Every farmer, including this farmer in the parable, fights weeds to protect the valued crop until harvest time.
The servants came to the landowner prepared to take immediate action,
“The servants asked him,
‘Do you want us to go and pull them up?’
‘No,’ he answered,
‘because while you are pulling the weeds,
you may uproot the wheat with them.’ “
Wisdom knows the right thing to do in the right way. The unknowing servants, though desiring to do good, wanted to do the right thing but in the wrong way — or at least at the wrong time.
Oh, how often I’ve been like these servants, rushing in to do what I can without forethought.
“For there is a proper time and
procedure for everything. . .”
Don’t Throw it Out
I think of another old expression, “Don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater!” In other words, in the haste to discard something undesirable, avoid throwing away something else worth holding on to.
In North America, we too quickly throw away the good. We see evidence of imperfections and cast the whole lot aside. Whether possessions, ministries, or people, whatever no longer serves our purpose or makes us look and feel good, we dispose of.
“Let both grow together until the harvest. . .”
Farmers learn how to harvest their crops in such a way that the least amount of weeds stays with the good grain. By setting the sieves, the chaff, weed seeds, and shrivelled kernels (or dockage) falls to the ground. Yet, try as he might a perfect sample often seems impossible to attain.
God has been speaking to me about the weeds in my life — the dockage He desires to remove. As much as I attempt to cooperate with the Holy Spirit, I’m exasperated by the blatant evidence of pride, selfishness and unbelief that remains in my “life sample.” God pours His grace into me, lovingly caring for every detail, yet I’m blemished, unproductive, and often disappointed with myself.
“But while everyone was sleeping,
his enemy came and sowed weeds
among the wheat,
and went away.”
This side of heaven we have an enemy, sowing the bad among the good God starts. I want it pulled out NOW, so that only good can flow from my life. Sometimes the tension feels intense!
At the root of everything ungodly live these three potent weeds: pride, selfishness and unbelief. All present themselves subtlely. I need gutsy people to challenge me when they see them sprouting up and taking root. Faithful mentors question the motivations behind my words and actions.
Through this parable of the wheat and tares, Jesus offered insight into the end of all things when God Himself will separate the good from the evil. Until then, our world, both external and internal, will contain both.
It’s interesting that the enemy worked while “everyone was sleeping.” That challenges me to alertness.
Just as the faithful farmer knows his crops and fields, I cannot afford to be ignorant of my personal weaknesses and tendencies.
God points me to another principle, however. What about those around me? Do I cast them aside, pulling them out by their roots, like the foolish servants wanted to do, while they are still developing in their faith? How do I treat others when evidence of weeds hang in heaps from them?
Do I water the “good seed” God is nurturing in them, allowing His sovereign ways and time to deal with the “dockage?” Am I so focused on the messy parts of people’s lives I miss the good God wants me to focus on? Do I see His reflection in everyone I meet?
“At That Time”
The parable reads,
“At that time I will tell the harvesters:
First collect the weeds and
tie them in bundles to be burned;
then gather the wheat and
bring it into my barn.”
This requires patience and trust on my part. God determines the time of the ultimate harvest. He instructs the harvesters in the process. He decides what will be preserved or destroyed.
“That time” is coming! The evidence of the natural harvest hangs thick in the autumn air. I pray I will as clearly sense the urgency of the spiritual harvest around me.
US2742235A – Broken wheat recovery system including tempering and impacting, and separating of shattered weed seeds from wheat seeds – Google Patents
Publication number US2742235A US2742235A US314297A US31429752A US2742235A US 2742235 A US2742235 A US 2742235A US 314297 A US314297 A US 314297A US 31429752 A US31429752 A US 31429752A US 2742235 A US2742235 A US 2742235A Authority US United States Prior art keywords wheat broken impact kernels seeds Prior art date 1952-10-11 Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.) Expired – Lifetime Application number US314297A Inventor Moen Rolf Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.) General Mills Inc Original Assignee General Mills Inc Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.) 1952-10-11 Filing date 1952-10-11 Publication date 1956-04-17 1952-10-11 Application filed by General Mills Inc filed Critical General Mills Inc 1952-10-11 Priority to US314297A priority Critical patent/US2742235A/en 1956-04-17 Application granted granted Critical 1956-04-17 Publication of US2742235A publication Critical patent/US2742235A/en 1973-04-17 Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical Status Expired – Lifetime legal-status Critical Current
- USPTO PatentCenter
- USPTO Assignment
- Global Dossier
- 235000021307 wheat Nutrition 0.000 title description 118
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 title description 69
- 238000005496 tempering Methods 0.000 title description 45
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 title description 16
- 230000003116 impacting Effects 0.000 title description 3
- 241000209140 Triticum Species 0.000 title 2
- 240000008529 Triticum aestivum Species 0.000 description 121
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 40
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 35
- 238000003801 milling Methods 0.000 description 25
- 235000013312 flour Nutrition 0.000 description 11
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 11
- 238000004140 cleaning Methods 0.000 description 10
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 10
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 9
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 description 7
- 235000013339 cereals Nutrition 0.000 description 7
- 239000004464 cereal grain Substances 0.000 description 5
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 description 5
- 235000020985 whole grains Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- 235000002673 Dioscorea communis Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 241000544230 Dioscorea communis Species 0.000 description 3
- 239000012535 impurity Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000006011 modification reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 235000009899 Agrostemma githago Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 240000001592 Amaranthus caudatus Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000009328 Amaranthus caudatus Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 244000075850 Avena orientalis Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000007319 Avena orientalis Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 240000004153 Hibiscus sabdariffa Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000001018 Hibiscus sabdariffa Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 235000005291 Rumex acetosa Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 244000076689 Setaria glauca Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000008515 Setaria glauca Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 235000007264 Triticum durum Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 241000209143 Triticum turgidum subsp. durum Species 0.000 description 2
- 244000178320 Vaccaria pyramidata Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000010587 Vaccaria pyramidata Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 241000219873 Vicia Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000010086 green foxtail Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 235000003513 sheep sorrel Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 235000013479 Amaranthus retroflexus Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 240000007528 Amaranthus viridis Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000004135 Amaranthus viridis Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 240000000772 Brassica cretica Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000003351 Brassica cretica Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000003343 Brassica rupestris Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000009344 Chenopodium album Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000005484 Chenopodium berlandieri Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000009332 Chenopodium rubrum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241001446467 Mama Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000201976 Polycarpon Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000746181 Therates Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000006227 byproduct Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000875 corresponding Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000428 dust Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012467 final product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000010460 mustard Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000019508 mustard seed Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000005204 segregation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009736 wetting Methods 0.000 description 1
- B — PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B02 — CRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING; PREPARATORY TREATMENT OF GRAIN FOR MILLING
- B02C — CRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING IN GENERAL; MILLING GRAIN
- B02C9/00 — Other milling methods or mills specially adapted for grain
- B02C9/04 — Systems or sequences of operations; Plant
BROKEN WHEAT RECOVERY SYSTEM, INCLUDING TEMPERING AND IMPACTING, AND SEPARATING OF SHATTERED WEED SEEDS FROM WHEAT SEEDS Filed Oct. 11, 1952 2 Sheets-Sheet 1 MIXTURE OF WEED SEEDS B BROKEN WHEAT SIFT L.) SMALL WEED SEEDS QSAND TEMPER MIXTURE OF WEED seems a BROKEN wm-zn SIFT L smu. wean SEPARATION sseos a SAND SEPARATION SHATTERED (SMALL nucnou 22 wsao mwseo sesos SEEDS (MAJOR FRACTION) a some anoxsn wezoaszzos WHEAT mm PORTION 0F anoxsn WHEAT FEED TEMPER ETC.
INVENTOR BY C M ATTORNEY April 17, 1956 AND IMPACTING, AND SEPARATING OF SHATTERED WEED SEEDS FROM WHEAT SEEDS Filed Oct. 11, 1952 FIG.3
2 Sheets-Sheet 2 was m as MILLED SAND WATER SMALL wssos Lwzn’ms couvsvon I MILLING SEPARATOR REST STONER srom=.s DUST COLLECTOR 1′ Inner DISC mama:
oATs SEPARATOR v A ASPIRATING war-:0 szsos A DISC a k SEPARATOR BROKEN KERNELS r– OF “HEAT L :ADDITIONALI SHATTERED |A$PIRATOR ween FURTHER SEEDS ‘IF NEEDED CLEANING OPERATIONS FOR WHOLE GRAINS or WHEAT CLEAN VIASHED necovsneo uuanoxzu WHEAT BROKEN KERNELS 0F WHEAT WATER mm VIETTING oouvsvon mun TEMPERING sms nsmuuoen or FLOUR 4,. mLuue pnocess INVEN’OR BY M ATTORNEY United States Patent BROKEN WHEAT RECQVERY SYSTEM INCLUD- ING TEMPERlNG AND EMPACTENG, AND SEP- ARATINGOF SHATTERED WEED SEEDS FROM WHEAT SEEDS Rolf Moen, Minneapolis, Minn assignor to General Mills, Inc., a corporation of Delaware Application October 11, 1952, Serial No. 314,297
16 Claims. (Cl. 241-9) The present invention relates to the milling of cereal grains and more particularly to a broken wheat recovery system as an addition to the usual milling process.
wheat is subjected to a cleaning operation prior to normal tempering and milling. In this wheat cleaning part of the process, efforts are made to separate the various types of weed seeds and other impurities from the particular cereal grains to be milled. For example, it has been customary to remove sand and impurities of relatively small size by passage of the grain through a milling separator near the start of the cleaning system. The
– milling separator also removes large rough materials separation may be applied to these liftings to separate the smaller weed seeds and broken wheat grains from the’slig’htly larger but still undersized whole grains of small wheat. Similarly, another separation by indented disk or cylinder machines can be used to separate the oats and longer grains. fromithe desired standard or large size grains of wheat. 1
That portion of the liftings from the’indented disk or cylinder machines represented by the small-size weed seed and broken Wheat fraction can not be readily classified to a further extent by standard methods since the small weed seeds are substantially the same in size and weight as the broken kernels of wheat. customaryto add this particular fraction to the mill feed, which is a by-product of the milling process. That portion of the fraction which actually includes broken kernels of wheat is thus lost to the flour milling portion of the process and represents a definite economic These smaller weed seeds and It has therefore been loss. This loss may be as great as one to two per cent of V the weed seeds could be more readily broken or crushed than the whole grains of wheat of the same size and therefore a separation could be attempted based on such differential breaking. I have attempted to utilize this I principle’with the liftings of the indented disk and cylinder machines. These attempts, however, while useful forfliniited separation of a few of the more friablel weed seeds, have resultedin too much additional breakage of the broken kernels of wheat, whenever the crushing or 2,742,235 Patented Apr. 1956 impact effect became great enough to shatter the majority .of’the undesiredcommon weed seeds to any substantial extent. The fact that the wheat was already cracked or to shattering as the more common weed seeds.
Therefore, until the present invention, there has been no satisfactory method for use in combination with the standard cleaning and milling process, which would effectively recover the broken kernels of wheat from weed seeds of similar size, permit the addition of this broken Wheat fraction to the flour milling portion of the process, and thus eliminate the loss of the broken wheat to feed.
With these problems and difiiculties of the prior art in view, it is one object of the present invention to provide an economical and useful broken wheat recovery system.
A further object is the provision of a practical and efiicient method for the recovery of broken kernels of wheat from a mixture of such kernels with weed seeds of similar size.
Still another object is the provision of a broken wheat recovery system in which a mixture of broken wheat .In general, I have found that these objects can be accomplished by subjecting the mixture of broken cereal grain kernelsand weed seeds to a tempering step before the mixture is subjected to breaking or impact. I have also found that it is possible to take advantage of the fact that the open or broken end of these wheat grains absorbs moisture initially at amuch greater rate than weed seeds of similar size. fore contemplates the diiferential tempering of the broken wheat and weed seeds to provide greater elasticity for the broken wheat kernels and thus minimize the shattering of such kernels when the mixture is subjected to breaking forces. The invention also involves the combination of such tempering with differential impact to shatter the weed seeds without substantial damage to the broken wheat kernels. Finally, the invention con= templates the use of aspiration to separate the major proportion of the shattered weed seeds from the heavier unshattered’kernels of broken wheat;
– In the drawings which accompany this application, Figure l is a flow sheet showing schematically the steps of a broken wheat recovery process according to the pres ent invention. 1
Fig- 2 shows apossible modification of the pro’cessof Fig. “1 in connectionlwith wheatsweed seed content; and i -;Fig. 3 shows the application ofa bfoken wheat recovery system to a standard wheat cleaning and flour millingprocess according to the invention”. v .i
Asshown in Fig. .1, the present broken wheata re covery system is appliedito a mixture.v ofweedse’eds and broken wheat of substantiallyflsimilar size: T-Prefrablyf this mixture is first subjected to a sifting operation which will remove janysmall weed seeds and sand which have not beenpreviously removedfby the. cleaning systernj V This preliminary-sifting, forexample, ca’n’be made on a No. 12 wire orthe equivalent.
After the preliminary sifting step, the rnixture of .broken” wheat “and weed seedsis’ subjected to a tempering stepn Because theopen or broken end ofthe wheat particles permits. initial moisture-absorption at a relativelyhigh rate, this tempering can be much shorter than that’re– quired in the normalcereal grainmilling process. .Since for satis The present invention thereaving a’ relatively high I 3 the actual time may vary with the type of wheat and .the method of moisture addition, the present invention contemplates that the tempering will be sufiicient to bring the broken wheat to a moisture content in the range from twelve per cent to twenty per cent of the dry wheat weight. The specific upper limit of this range in a given case will be dictated largely by the ease of later milling of the broken wheat. A moisture content substantially above this range will make the subsequent milling more difiicult. Within this range,” the preferred moisture content is substantially fifteen per cent.
After the addition of suflicient moisture to achieve the desired tempering, the mixture is given a suitable rest time. As noted above, the untempered broken wheat is almost as susceptible to shattering as the weed seeds. The cracked or broken wheat, however, can absorb moisture very rapidly. With a tempering rest time of as little as three to five minutes, there is a rapid decrease in friability or brittleness of the broken wheat. Thus the wheat rapidly becomes sufl’lciently elastic to resist further shattering when subjected tov breaking or impact forces.
At the same time, the unbroken Wee-d seeds absorb moisture much more slowly. Thus the brittleness of these weed seeds is not substantially decreased during a fiveminute tempering rest period. The tempered mixture can then be subjected to breaking or impact forces which produce a maximum effective shattering of thebrittle weed seeds without substantial further breakage of the tempered and more elastic broken wheat.
As far as the broken wheat is concerned, I have found that the tempering rest time could be extended beyond the five-minute range to as much as one hour or even eight hours. During this extra rest period, however, the elasticity or resistance to shattering of the wheat would increase only slightly, if at all, over the elasticity obtained after substantially five minutes.
The weed seeds, on the other hand, show a slowbut steady increase in toughness, as the tempering time is extended. For the longer tempering times, the breakage of a Weed seeds decreases, so that fewer weed seeds will be than therate of improvement, if any, in elasticity of the broken wheat.
In other words at a tempering time of substantially five minutes, the ultimate recovery of broken wheat will be almost, if not fully, as high as it would be at longer tempering times. The amount of weed seeds left unshattered (and therefore incapable of separation from the broken wheat) will be relatively lower at the five-minute range than at longer periods of temper. Thus, while satisfactory results can be obtained with longer tempering times in cases where aslightly higher percentage of weed seeds can be accepted in the final product, the preferred tempering time according to the present invention is substantially of the order of five minutes, This relatively short tempering time also has the economic advantage that the storage bins required for handling the mixtureduring tempering can be kept at a minimum. So in a given operation, one may choose to use the longer tempering times, if it appears that there is enough more wheat recovered to offset the cost of extra storage bin capacity, and if the somewhat higher weed seed content can be accepted within the quality standards for the particular operation.
The simplest method of adding the tempering moisture is by direct cold water addition at the head of a wetting conveyor. Addition of moisture by othermethods is also particles are projected against a suitable impact surface at velocities sufficient to shatter the more brittle weed seed-s, without substantial shattering effect on the tempered and more elastic broken or cracked kernels of wheat. To produce’the desired impact forces, various types of impact machines are available. Some of these machines include rotors with a large number of pegs which subject the particles’to a series of multiple impacts of unpredictable force and effect. While some results can be obtained with such machines, it is generally preferred, according to the present invention, to use a type of impact machine in which each particle in the mixture is subjected to a single impact under more controlled conditions.
For example, the particles may be fed to the center of a distributing rotor of the radial vane type, so that each particle is centrifugally forced radially outwardly along the vanes and then leaves the rotor along a somewhat tangential path to strike a cylindrical impact surface or liner which surrounds the rotor. The actual effective shattering force of the impact depends upon a number of factors, such as the velocity of the individual particle at the time of impact, the angle of impact,.and the nature of the impact surface. The velocity factor can be controlled in part by the diameter of the rotor and the speed of its rotation. The rotor speed and diameter will determine the tangential component of velocity at the instant a particle leavesthe rotor. The radial component of velocity at this instant depends not only on this rotor diameter and speed, but also on the frictional resistance to outward sliding of the particles along the vanes, and the radial distance from the rotor center to the point at which particles first engage the vanes or blades of the rotor.
The actual velocity and angle of impact will depend, in turn, not only on theresultant velocity at the instant the particles leave the rotor, but also on the radial airspace between rotor and liner, and the type of corrugations, if any, on the impact surface. Where the impact surface is perfectly cylindrical and smooth, the particles will strike this surface a glancing blow as they leave the rotor and cross the airspace. Certain types of impact machines increase the impact effect by the use of a corrugated liner for the impact surface, the corrugations of this liner being oriented so that the individual particles tend to strike perpendicularly against the faces of the corrugations. With such a corrugated liner, lower particle velocities can generally be used to achieve the same shattering effect on the particles as would be achieved with higher particle velocities and a smooth cylindrical impact surface.
Because the desired impact forces can be achieved with different types and sizes of machines operated at speeds which vary according to the particular machine to be used, and because of the ditficulty of measuring the absolute particle velocity to define the operating range of impact forces, I have resorted to an equivalent yardstick for the definition of such range.
Ingeneral, satisfactory differential breakage between weed seeds and broken wheat kernels can be achieved by the use of impact forces equivalent to those obtained with a machine having a corrugated cylindrical impact surface of the dimensions specified in Example ‘3 below, a 13 inch diameter vane-type rotor in which the particles first engage the vanes 3 /2 inches from the rotor center,
and a rotor speed in the range from 3300 to 3900 R. P. M. The impact velocities corresponding to these conditions are believed to be approximately in the range from 220 to 290 feet per second at an impact angle which is roughly twentydegrees off the perpendicular, due primarily to the twenty degree vertical inclination of the corrugations set forth in Example 3.” In other words, the particle moves alongapath which substantially coincides with a line normalto the line of intersection between the plane of the rotor and the impact surface at the point ofIim pact, while the particle path makes a’twen’ty degree. angle with a line normal to the line of intersection between the impact surface and a plane which contains the particle path and is perpendicular to the rotor at the point of impact. Since the particle path may change as the rotor speed changes, the angle of impact in the rotor plane may vary somewhat from the perpendicular in a given case, although an effort is made to achieve perpendicular im pact. Because the computations of these velocities and of the impact angle are based on certain assumptions as to friction along the rotor blade and ignore the possibility of air damping or deflection in crossing the space from rotor to impact surface, it is felt that the actual machine dimensions and speeds provide a more accurate yardstick by which to define the impact forces.
Best results were obtained with the above impact machine at a rotary speed of 3500 revolutions per minute. Subject to the same assumptions and limitations mentioned above, this preferred case is believed to involve inches internal diameter. In some cases, equivalent selective impact forces can even be achievedby successive passage throughtwo impact machines either or both of which produce effective velocities somewhat below the above specified ranges. Pin rotors give more gentle impact than vane rotors.
. Equivalentvelocitiesfor other impact surfaces and for impact machines of other types and dimensions can be readily determined by simple tests in any given case. Within these ranges, as set forth above, the impact effect will be sufficient to shatter or hull substantially all of the weed seeds normally present in large quantities with cereal grains, such as black bindweed, cockle, and foxtail, as
There are, of course, certain exceptions inwhich the weed seeds are actually more resistant to impact than wheat. Such seeds include mustard, vetches, and pigeon grass. Because of their small size, mustard seeds can be removed by the preliminary sifting operation described above, while vetches and pigeon grass normally occur in such small quantities that they do not represent a serious problem. If their removal should become necessary, a spiral separator could be used.
After the differential impact step of the process, it is necessary to separate the broken weed seed particles from the substantially unchangedbroken wheat kernels. While various separations on the basis of shape and size might be utilized, the present invention contemplates aspiration as the preferred method of separation. Attempts to remove the weed seed hulls and pieces from the wheat by sifting or thickness grading proved lessv successful because of excessive wheat loss. Separation on the basis of terminal velocity of the particles, as in aspiration, yields In some cases, a preliminary modification of the broken wheat’recovery system may be used as illustrated in Fig.
2 of the drawing. This modification is particularly suitable in the case of spring wheats having very high concentrations of weed seeds. According to this variation,
6 content, is removed. For example, a gravity table can be used for preliminary removal’of about fifteen per cent of the liftings and will substantially simplifyrecovery of broken wheat from the remaining eighty-five percent. In this case, the broken wheat removed in the small or fifteen per cent fraction will represent a very small proportion of the total broken wheat in the liftings subjected to the present process, and therefore the loss of this small portion of the broken wheat to feed will not be serious. The broken wheat recovered from the remaining eightyfive per cent or major fraction will represent a substantial economic gain as against the prior art operations in which no broken wheat recovery is attempted.
To illustrate the application of the principles of the present invention the following examples are given.
Example 1 A mixture of weed seeds and broken kernels of wheat comprising the liftings of an indented disk separator in a durum wheat cleaning operation was processed as follows. After preliminarysifting over 12 wire to remove sand and other small impurities, the mixture was-tempered by addition of enough water to bring the wheat moisture content to substantially fifteen per cent of the dry wheat weight, followed by a tempering rest time of five minutes.
The mixture was then subjected to impact in a machine having a smooth cylindrical impact surface of eighteen inches internal diameter, and a 13% inch diameter vane-type rotor in which the particles first engaged the vanes or blades at a radial distance of 3 /2 inches from the rotor center. The rotor speed was 4300′ R. P. M.
The shattered weed seed particles were then removed by aspiration in a vertical air current at an air velocity of nine feet per second uniformly over the cross-sectional area of aspiration. The recovered broken wheat was substantially free from such. dark colored particles as the black bindweed originally present in the mixture and was suitable. for reintroduction in the durum milling process without adverse effect on the rigid color requirements of a durum operation.
Example 2 A broken wheat recovery system according to the pres-‘ ent invention was incorporated in a normal durum wheat milling flow as shown in Fig. 3. The seeds and cracked The weed seed and broken wheat mixture thus tempered was then subjected to differential impact by means of a 13 inch vane-type rotor operating at 3500 R. P. M. against a corrugated liner with the specific dimensions and corrugations noted below in Example 3. The particles first engaged the rotor blades three and one-half inches radially out from the rotor center, The impact machine was equipped with an aspirating jacket with an air flow sufficient to register 0.9 inch water gauge differential pressure. Since this particular aspiration did not provide a sufficiently selective separation, a second aspiration was made at a uniform air velocity of ten feet per second. The broken wheat recovered by this operation gave a yield of eighty-five to ninety percent of the total initial weight of weed seeds and broken wheat, which was suitable for reintroduction into the milling system. The recovered wheat appeared essentially free from dark colored weed seed coats which could cause specks in flour.
This recovered wheat was returned to the durum mill-r ing system by introduction at a point subsequent to the moisture addition of the normal wheat tempering operationto avoid excessive moisture pick-up by the broken wheat through direct water addition. Here the broken wheat was. added just before the wheat reached the tempering bins. The broken wheat then reached milling moisture by equalizing with tempered whole grains of wheat during the standard tempering rest period. The
Example 3 The broken wheat recovery system according to the present invention can also be utilized in connection with a standard flow for the milling of bread wheats. The actual flow is similarto that described in Fig. 3 and Example 1, with only minor changes. The tempering involves water addition suflicient to bring the moisture content to fifteen per cent. The impact step follows immediately after a tempering rest time of five minutes. For the impact step, a machine with a 13 inch diameter vane-type rotor and a corrugated liner is operated at 3500 R. P. M. The particles initially engage the rotor blades at a radial distance of 3 /2 inches from the rotor center,-
and the corrugations provide perpendicular impact surfaces whose inner edges are located on a circle of 14% inches diameter and whose outer edges are located on a circle of /8 inches diameter, with each corrugation covering approximately Vs inch along the outer circle. While these corrugations provide impact faces more nearly perpendicular to the paths of projection of the particles, as measured in’the horizontal plane of the rotor, they are inclined roughly twenty degrees from the vertical (i. e., from a line perpendicular to the plane of the rotor), in order to deflect the impacted particles downwardly out of the impact zone and away from the rotor.
For separation after impact, a single aspiration is used at a uniform air velocity of ten feet per second. The recovered broken Wheat can then be reintroduced in the main mill fiow as shown in Fig. .3 at a point subsequent to the addition of moisture in the main tempering step. The actual impact forces in a given case may require adjustment to obtain optimum results from specific bread wheat varieties. In general, these bread wheats require more careful handling, since there is a smaller differential between the forces required for weed seed breakage and those forces whichwill shatter. the broken bread wheat grains, than the differential between the forces required for weed seed breakage and those’which will shatter broken durum grains.
The yield ofrecovered broken wheat in this particular mill flow was of the order of seventy per cent of the total initial weight of the weed seed and broken wheat fraction and thus represents a definite economic advantage over prior mill flows in which no such broken wheat recovery system is incorporated. It is lower than the yield in Example 2, partly because of the smaller breakage differential just noted. It might be increased by more gentle treatment with slightly lower impact forces in a given case.
While the above examples illustrate the application of the present invention to specific milling operations, it will be understood that the effectiveness of a broken wheat recovery system will be largely dependent upon a number of factors. The first factor is the variety of wheat, inasmuch as soft wheats are less susceptible to shattering by impact than the hard vitreous varieties. Secondly, the nature of the weed seeds present Will affect the operation, since all weed seeds do not respond equally to impact breakage. Finally, the quality required of the broken wheat recovered will determine to a large extent the amount of recovery which can be attempted.
Thus each mill presents a separate problem, and the exact procedure to be foliowed may have to be adapted to the particular situation, in accordance with the general teachings and principles-expressed above. The optimum conditions for any given application can, however, be readily determined’by a few simple tests, once the above principles are understood. Since minor changes, variations, andmodifications of thepresent process will be readily apparent to those persons skilled in the milling field, the present invention is intended to cover those variations in operating conditions and processing tech-v nique which fallwithin the scope of the attached claims.
1. The method of recovering broken kernels of cereal grain from a mixture of such kernels with weed seeds of substantially similar size which comprises tempering the mixture for a relatively short time sufficient for moisture absorption by the broken kernels, terminating the tempering before substantial moisture absorption by the v weed seeds takes place, and subjecting the tempered broken kernels within the range from twelve per cent to twenty per cent of the dry wheat weight. 3. The method according to claim 2 in which the moisture content of the broken kernels is brought to substantially fifteen per cent. 7
4. The method of recovering broken kernels of wheat from a mixture of such kernels with weed seeds of substantially similar size which comprises tempering the mixture for a relatively ‘short time suflicient for moisture absorption by the broken kernels, terminating the tempering before substantial moisture absorption by the weed seeds takes place, and subjecting the tempered mixture to ‘an’impact step in which each kernel and seed is projected forcibly against an impact surface at a velocity just sufiicient to break up the relatively drier and more brittle-weed seeds without substantial shattering of the moistened and more elastic broken kernels, and thereafter segregating the un-shattered broken kernels of wheat from’the smaller particles of shattered weed seeds. 5. The method of claim 4 in which the impact step comprises projecting the kernels and. seeds at velocities’ yielding impact effects equivalent, to those achieved by centrifugally flinging them from a 13inch diameter vanetype rotor in which the particles first engage the rotor’blades 3 /2 inches radially out from the rotor cen- ‘ter, at rotor speeds in the range from 3300 to 3900 R. P. M., against a corrugated cylindrical impact surface in which the corrugations provide impact surfaces substantially perpendicular to the pathsof projection of the particles, as measured in the plane of the rotor, the impact surfaces’being inclined approximately twenty degrees from the perpendicular to said plane, and the inner edges of .the corrugations being located on a circle of 14% inches diameter, the outer edges on a circle of 15% inches diameter.
6. The method, of claim 5 in which the equivalent 13′ inch rotor speed is substantially 3500 R. P. M.
7. The’ method according to claim 4 in which the segregated. broken wheat kernels. are recombined with whole kernels of wheat in a standard flour milling process at a point subsequent to normal addition of tempering moisture to the whole kernels] 8. The method of claim 4 in which the tempering stepinvolves the addition. of moisture in an amount sufficient to bring the moisture content of the broken kernels .withinthe range from twelve per cent to twenty percent of the dry wheat weights 9. The method of claim 8 in which the impact step comprises projecting the kernels and seeds at velocities yielding impact effects equivalent to those achieved bycentrifugally flinging them from a 13 inch diameter vanetype rotor in which the particles first engage the rotor blade 3% inches radially out from the rotor center, at rotor speeds in the range from 3300 to 3900 R. P. M., against a corrugated cylindrical impact surface in which the corrugations provide’impact surfaces substantially perpendicular to the paths of projection of the particles, as measured in the plane of the rotor, the impact surfaces being inclined approximately twenty degrees from the perpendicular to said plane, andthe inner edges of the corrugations being located’on a circle of 14% inches diameter, the outer edges on a circle of 15% inches diameter.
10. The method of claim 9 in which the moisture content of the broken kernels is brought to substantially fifteen per cent, the total tempering time between the moisture addition and impact step is substantially five minutes, and the equivalent 13 inch rotor speed is substantially 3500 R. P. M.
11. The method of recovering broken kernels of wheat from a mixture of such kernels with weed seeds of substantially similar size, including at least some of the following seeds, black bindweed, foxtail, cockle, pigweed, and sorrel, which comprises tempering the mixture by addition of moisture in an amount sufiicient to bring the moisture content of the broken kernels witl1- in the range from twelve per cent to twenty per cent of the dry wheat weight, permitting the added moisture to penetrate the broken kernelsfduring a rest period of at least five minutes, and; immediately thereafter subjecting the tempered mixture to an impact step in which each kernel and seed is projected forcibly against’an impact surface at velocities yielding impact effects equivalent to those achieved by centrifugally flinging the kernels and seeds from a 13 inch diameter vane-type rtor in which the particles first engage the rotor blades 3% inches radially out from the rotor center, at rotor speeds in the range from 3300 to 3900 R. P. M,, against a corrugated cylindrical impact surface in which the corrugations provide impact surfaces substantially perpendicular to the paths of projection of the particles, ,as
measured in the plane of the rotor, th’e impact surfaces being inclined approximately twenty degrees from the perpendicular to said plane, and the inner edges of the corrugations being located on a circle of 14% inches diameter, the outer edges on a circle of 15% inches diameter, said impact step shattering substantially all of said weed seeds without substantial shattering of the broken wheat kernels, and thereafter segregating the unshattered broken kernels of wheat from the smaller particles of shattered weed seeds.
12. The method of claim 11 in which the segregation step comprises aspiration of the mixture at air velocities sulfieient to lift the shattered weed seed particles without lifting the broken wheat kernels.
13, The rnethod of claim 12 in which the aspirating air velocity is in the range from five to thirteen feet per l j 10 improvement which comprises recovering the broken wheat kernels by segregating from the whole kernels a mixture of the broken kernels with weed seeds of substantially similar size, differentially’tempering the mixture of weed seeds and broken kernelsby addition of moisture during a time sufficient for substantial moisture absorption by the broken ,kernels and, terminating the tempering before substantial moisture absorption by the unbroken weed seeds takes place, subjecting the tempered mixture of weed seeds and broken kernels to an impact step by forcible projection of the individual seeds wheat to the whole kernelsof wheat at a point subsequent 101116 addition of moisture to the whole kernels. 15. The process according to claim 14 in which the normal tempering of the whole kernels includes storage of the wheat after addition of moisture for desired moisture distribution and the recovered broken kernels are added to the whole kernels subsequent to the addition of tempering moisture to the latter but prior to the tempering storage of the moistened whole kernels.
16. In the process of milling flour from a mixture of whole kernels of wheat, broken kernels of wheat and weed seeds by cleaning and separating the whole kernels, tempering the whole kernels by adding moisture thereto, and subsequently breaking, classifying, purifying and reducing the ‘wheat to produce flour, the improvement which comprisesrecovering the broken wheat’kernels by segregating from the whole kernels a mixture of the broken kernels with weed seeds of substantially similar size, subjecting the mixture’of weed seeds and broken kernels to an impact step by forcible projection of the individual seeds and kernels’against an impact surface at a velocity sufficient to shatter the weed seeds without substantial shattering of the broken kernels, segregating’the broken kernels from the shattered weed seeds,
and reintroducing the recovered broken, wheat kernels in the flour milling process by adding them to the whole kernels of wheat at a point subsequent to the addition of moisture to the whole kernels.
References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 7 OTHER REFERENCES Flour Milling by Lockwood, published 1945 by Northern Publishing Co., Ltd. 230 Produce Exchange, New York. Pages 128-131 and 188-192.
US314297A 1952-10-11 1952-10-11 Broken wheat recovery system including tempering and impacting, and separating of shattered weed seeds from wheat seeds Expired – Lifetime US2742235A ( en )